Also known as:disqualification rule · disqualifying rules · disqualification · disqualifications
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
Rules that prohibit a lawyer, judge, or other participant from involvement in a legal proceeding because of conflicts of interest, prior government service, campaign relationships, or other specified grounds. The rules allocate burdens, permit waivers under stated conditions, and distinguish between personal disqualification and imputed disqualification to a firm.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
5
Client Waives Firm Disqualification
Dynamic Solutions hires Dover Bank as new counsel in a contract dispute. A lawyer who recently joined Dover Bank previously represented Dynamic Solutions in a substantially related matter and possesses material confidential information. Dynamic Solutions, after full disclosure, provides written consent to Dover Bank's continued representation under the conditions of Rule 1.7.
Erroneous Counsel Disqualification Reversed
Damian Decker retained his chosen counsel for a criminal trial. The trial court erroneously disqualified that counsel on conflict grounds. On appeal the reviewing court holds the error structural, reverses the conviction automatically, and orders a new trial without requiring Decker to demonstrate prejudice.
Put it into practice
Test Yourself
10
Practice Questions5
· 27 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Federal Rules
Uniform Acts
Model Codes
Restatements
Hornbooks
Government Lawyer Conflict Governed Elsewhere
Delilah Duran, formerly an IRS attorney, joins Delta Dynamics. The firm is asked to represent a taxpayer in a matter Duran supervised while at the IRS. The court applies the government-lawyer disqualification provisions rather than the general imputed-disqualification rule to determine whether screening or consent can cure the conflict.
Screening Prevents Firm Disqualification
Darius Dixon, a former SEC supervisor who oversaw an enforcement action, joins Dakota Industries. The firm screens Dixon from the same matter now pending in private litigation, obtains government consent, and demonstrates that disqualification would harm both the client and public enforcement interests. The court permits the firm to continue representation.
Campaign Manager Triggers Judicial Recusal
Judge Dolores Diaz's former campaign treasurer appears as counsel for one party in a civil case. Because the treasurer held a central campaign role, the judge is automatically disqualified. A reasonable observer would question impartiality. An ordinary campaign contributor appearing as counsel would not trigger the same automatic result.
Common questions
Frequently Asked
5
When may a client waive a lawyer's disqualification under the imputed-conflict rules?+
A client may waive disqualification when the affected client gives informed consent confirmed in writing and the conditions of Rule 1.7 are satisfied.
Supporting sources
What standard governs disqualification of a firm that employs a former government lawyer?+
Disqualification of lawyers associated with former or current government lawyers is governed by Rule 1.11 rather than the general imputed-disqualification provisions.
Supporting sources
What remedy follows an erroneous disqualification of a defendant's chosen retained counsel?+
Erroneous disqualification of retained counsel at trial is structural error that requires automatic reversal without any showing of specific prejudice.
Supporting sources
Under what circumstances may a former SEC lawyer's new firm avoid disqualification?+
The firm may avoid disqualification when appropriate screening measures are implemented, the government consents, and the balance of public enforcement interests and client hardship favors continued representation.
Supporting sources
When does a judge's relationship with a campaign official require automatic disqualification?+
A judge is automatically disqualified when a campaign manager, treasurer, or similarly central campaign official appears as a party or counsel because the relationship is so close that a reasonable person would question impartiality.
Supporting sources
Business Associations Corporations and LlcsShareholder and member litigation: direct, derivative, and class litigation · Shareholder and member litigation: direct, derivative, and class litigationUBEFoundational