Also known as:claim in recoupment · recoupment claims · recoupment
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A claim that an obligor may assert against an assignee to reduce the amount owed on an assigned contract. The claim must arise from the transaction that gave rise to the contract between the obligor and the assignor.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
2
Defective Goods Offset Against Assignee
Christopher Collins purchased machinery from Compass Logistics under a contract that included a warranty of fitness. Compass Logistics assigned its right to payment to Cardinal Insurance. When the machinery proved defective, Christopher Collins withheld part of the payment. Cardinal Insurance sued for the full amount. Christopher Collins may reduce the sum owed by asserting his warranty claim arising from the original sale.
Bankruptcy Trustee Defends Against Setoff
Cypress Technologies held accounts receivable assigned to a secured lender. After Cypress Technologies entered bankruptcy, the trustee objected when an account debtor attempted to reduce its obligation by a claim arising from the same supply contract. The court permitted the reduction because the claim qualified as recoupment tied directly to the assigned transaction.
Put it into practice
Test Yourself
10
Practice Questions5
· 10 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Uniform Acts
Model Codes
Casebooks
Hornbooks
Course Outlines
Study Supplements
In re Communication Dynamics, Inc.382 B.R. 219 (Bankr. D. Del. 2003)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
How does a claim in recoupment differ from an ordinary setoff?+
A claim in recoupment must arise from the same transaction that produced the assigned contract. An ordinary setoff may arise from a separate transaction. Under UCC § 9-404(a)(1), only transaction-based claims reduce the assignee's recovery.
Supporting sources
Can an account debtor recover more than the amount owed when asserting a claim in recoupment?+
No. The claim may be asserted only to reduce the amount the account debtor owes. It does not permit an affirmative recovery against the assignee beyond that reduction.
Supporting sources
Does notice of assignment cut off later claims in recoupment?+
No. Claims in recoupment arising from the original transaction remain available regardless of when notice is received. Only other defenses or claims that accrue after notice are subject to the cutoff rule in UCC § 9-404(a)(2).
Supporting sources
What happens when a secured party collects accounts after default?+
The secured party remains subject to the account debtor's valid claims in recoupment. Collection efforts must honor those offsets to satisfy the commercial reasonableness requirement.
Business Associations RelationshipsLiability rules related to business associations · Liability of corporate officers and directors under the Model Business Corporation Act (2016)NEXTGENIntermediate