Also known as:ad-hoc balancing test · balancing test
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A judicial method of resolving constitutional or regulatory disputes by identifying the competing public and private interests at stake and then weighing those interests against one another on a case-by-case basis.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Disability Benefit Termination Review
Arthur Abrams received monthly Social Security disability payments for several years. After new generalized monitoring data indicated he no longer qualified, the agency sent written notice and invited a written response but scheduled no hearing before cutting off the checks. Abrams sued, claiming the lack of a pre-termination evidentiary hearing violated due process. The court applied the ad hoc balancing test, weighed Abrams's private interest in continued benefits against the low risk of error from documentary evidence and the agency's fiscal and administrative burdens, and concluded that the written procedures satisfied due process.
Vested Rights in Development Permit
Austin Abbott obtained a building permit and spent substantial sums grading his land in reliance on existing zoning. The city then rezoned the parcel to prohibit the planned use. Abbott sued to complete the project. The court applied the ad hoc balancing test to determine whether depriving Abbott of the right would be inequitable given his good-faith expenditures and the city's interests in the new zoning.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Common Law
Study Supplements
Public Employee Speech Discipline
Alfred Ashford, a city engineer, prepared an internal memo criticizing brake-repair delays on municipal buses as required by his job duties. His supervisor disciplined him for the memo. Ashford sued, arguing the discipline violated the First Amendment. The court held that because the speech was made pursuant to official duties, the usual public-concern balancing test did not apply and the employer could evaluate the speech without constitutional constraint.
Historic Landmark Designation
Amber Alonzo owned a historic commercial building she wished to modernize. A city heritage board designated the structure a landmark, blocking demolition and forcing costly retrofits. Alonzo sued, claiming a regulatory taking. The court applied the ad hoc balancing test, considered the economic impact, interference with investment-backed expectations, and the character of the historic-preservation action, and concluded that economically viable uses remained so no taking occurred.
Tobacco Advertising Restrictions
Atlas Ventures, a tobacco company, challenged state regulations limiting outdoor advertising near schools. The company argued the rules burdened commercial speech. The court applied the ad hoc balancing test, weighed the state's interest in protecting minors against the extent of the speech restriction, and upheld the regulations as reasonable.
Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly533 U.S. 625 (2001)
Public Employee Political Speech
Angela Acosta, a county deputy, made an offhand remark supporting a controversial political candidate while at work. Her supervisor fired her. Acosta sued, claiming First Amendment protection. The court applied the ad hoc balancing test, weighed the employee's interest in political expression against the employer's interest in workplace efficiency and public confidence, and determined the discharge was justified.
Rankin v. McPherson483 U.S. 378 (1987)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
What factors does the ad hoc balancing test consider?+
The test requires identification of the competing public and private interests followed by an intensely subjective weighing of the many relevant factors in each case.
How does the ad hoc balancing test differ from strict scrutiny?+
The ad hoc balancing test is deferential and case-specific while strict scrutiny demands narrow tailoring to a compelling interest. The former was used in Barenblatt and the latter in Gibson.
When is the ad hoc balancing test used in due process cases?+
It is used to decide whether pre-deprivation process is required by weighing the private interest, the risk of erroneous deprivation, the value of additional safeguards, and the government's administrative and fiscal interests.
How is the ad hoc balancing test applied in regulatory takings claims?+
Courts weigh the economic impact on the claimant, the interference with distinct investment-backed expectations, and the character of the governmental action such as historic preservation.
458 U.S. 419 (1982)Property
…respective apartments." 53 N. Y. 2d 124, 153, 423 N. E. 2d 320, 335 (1981). In so ruling, the court applied the multifactor balancing test prescribed by this Court's recent Takings Clause decisions. Those decisions teach that takings questions should be resolved through "essentially ad hoc, factual inquiries," Kaiser Aetna…